exploregon said:
I just bought one myself from a user here. The first time out with it will be tomorrow at a group "outing". I'm very excited to get out with it after reading all the good results from so many different users. Yesterday I bought the 11" pro coil (got a deal off ebay for $110 shipped). When that one arrives I'm putting all three coils head-to-head testing each over the same area starting with the X2 stock coil, the Pro 11", then the 12 x 10 SEF. Should be fun if I can get to a site that will be good testing grounds.
It'll be fun hearing of and seeing your results. Please keep us updated with your finds!
Please post your findings on this head to head! I love to read field tests like this on coils with undug targets and such in the field. That's one of the reasons why I enjoy Bryce's coil field reports so much as it gives me a good feel of just what certain coils may be capable of versus others.
One way to compare them is to lay poker chips on all targets you find before digging them and then re-test all those same marked spots with the other coils. Number your poker chips and then record the # and the response from various angles with each coil so the comparisons are fresh in your mind as they are put on paper. Only problem with that is that you still need to grid the area with each new coil to see if it finds other targets the other coils missed and mark those as well. Then re-check with the first coils that didn't find them to see if they can't or you just missed them by accident when using the other coils the first time. Once all that is done and all targets have been marked/cross checked, dig'em up and record what each target was and whether it was deep, masked, or on edge.
I just love to read field tests like this myself and always like it when they are done in extensive detail on undug targets to judge the various performance factors. Another method is to grid a small area with one coil, digging "good" targets, and then re-gridding with the other coils. It's still a pretty decent way to judge what one might do better than another based on what each coil found, but how do you know the second or third coil wouldn't have also found those targets you dug with the first one, or that you simply missed swinging over a target with the first coil that one of the others found? That's why when they are all used to grid an area and targets marked, and then each coil is used to re-check those marked targets, I feel you really see just how they compare to each other.
I can tell you this one other thing about the 12x10. In my tests of it against my 10" stock coil I tested both over a buried silver dime. With the 12x10 on I kept lowering my sensitivity level until I could just barely still get an ID and hit out of the dime with the lowest possible sensitivity setting. I then didn't touch the sensitivity setting and put the 10" stock coil on. The stock coil could NOT hear the dime, let alone get a ID out of it, while the 12x10 did. I even switched back to the 12x10 without touching the sensitivity still to see if this was a fluke, but once again the 12x10 could easily see the dime. That tells me that even with the same sensitivity setting the 12x10 is deeper, and since the 12x10 allows me to run higher sensitivity settings than the stock coil at the same exact sites, by that virtue alone I know it's also getting deeper, not to mention just the shear bigger size of the 12x10 than a round 10" coil that also should give you more depth. I can't say it enough, I love this coil!