Charts....I love charts.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/afc2b/afc2bb909691e9b6874efeaf98a6d9cc39743cf8" alt="Big Grin :biggrin: :biggrin:"
Man after my own heart. Yea, I still need to do more 12x10 versus 10" Tornado tests. If you remember a while back I did some in ground testing of the two coils and with the sensitivity set at 3PM the stock coil wouldn't respond (or at least get a good ID...can't remember...see the 12x10 thread) while the 12x10 was hitting the target. That alone told me the 12x10 appears deeper at the same sensitivity settings than the stock coil. With the cold weather at hand I plan to do some more tests comparing these two coils. So far from field use I can say that I appear to be digging wheats deeper at sites that I plain out missed with the stock coil. Regardless, for the dry conditions I know the 12x10 was popping wheats deeper on a regular basis than the stock coil would do. But, there is something to be said for controlled testing. I like setting things up so that I can compare the coils to known factors and then judge results based on that.
In summary so far...The 15x12 did not appear deeper for me on land at my medium to high mineral sites than the stock coil. I attribute this to it seeing more ground matrix, thus degrading the target quality. Note that that does not mean it couldn't be run at higher sensitivity settings than stock on many occasions, just that the quality of the signal seemed to be degraded by the larger ground matrix the coil was seeing. In mineralized sand on my fresh water beaches, though, the 15x12 was much deeper than the stock coil. For that reason if your primary target is beach hunting then I would opt for the 15x12 over the 12x10. Don't know yet if the 15x12 is deeper than it on the beach, but even if the 12x10 is as deep or deeper in the sand the coverage of the 15x12 is fantastic. That being said, the 12x10's coverage beach hunting is still an improvement over the stock coil. I would not use the 15x12 in the water. It was too much drag for me. I suspect the 12x10's drag in the water would be no worse that you could tell than the stock coil or the S-12.
As said, thus far the 12x10 appears deepest on land for me than either above coils. In the sand it also seems deeper than the stock coil. I feel it is more stable, quiet, allows higher sensitivity settings, pinpoints better, separates better, and so on than the stock coil. The 15x12, using the base of the "V" at the tip or tail of the coil, is just as easy as the 12x10 to pinpoint with. Actually I find I can pinpoint with either one of these coils better than the stock coil, which I also use the tip or tail of to PP. The 15x12 was sensitive to tiny targets. The 12x10 appears even more sensitive to tiny stuff. That might be important if you are hunting chains. Both of these coils seem to false off of iron less than the stock coil. They are very stable and quiet. The 12x10 appears to change the audio of the Sovereign to me, making all targets sound a bit higher in pitch and crisper.
I will be doing some further in field comparisons of these two coils and some air testing as well to post. I want to compare them on some buried targets in sand as well as more land testing. Also some coins on edge because I feel both these SEF coils hit coins at odd angles better than the stock coil. Some mask testing is also in order.
By the way, I think somebody from Kellyco mentioned a while back that if you mention FindMall you get free shipping on the coil, which I think saves like $14 or so. The coil is always "on sale" for $169 (the 12x10).